Shipment request intake
Structure an incoming order or booking request, check required fields and prepare a shipment record for the agreed Descartes process. Identify existing requests before proposing a new record.
Explore this workflowAI Operators · TMS
Plan AI workflows around your Descartes TMS: request intake, shipment updates and exception handoffs. Confirm the product, API or EDI access and controls.
Configured for your environment. Available interfaces, accessible records and permitted actions depend on your product edition, account permissions and agreed workflow.
Discuss your Descartes workflowConfigured around your environment. Governed by your SOPs.
Where integration creates value
Transportation teams receive changes in emails, attachments and partner messages even when their core shipment record already exists in a TMS. Re-entering those details is only part of the work: someone also has to establish which shipment changed and whether the proposed action is permitted.
For Descartes, the integration discussion starts with the actual product. The name spans multiple solutions, so a capability documented for one should not be presented as coverage for the whole portfolio. Shipflow’s workflow design connects approved sources and the appropriate operational record after that boundary is established.
Workflow opportunities
Structure an incoming order or booking request, check required fields and prepare a shipment record for the agreed Descartes process. Identify existing requests before proposing a new record.
Explore this workflowMatch carrier messages to the appropriate shipment and event. Separate a forecast from an actual milestone, and prepare updates only to the permitted fields.
Explore this workflowGather the record, original message and discrepancy into one review context. Route missed appointments or unclear instructions to the responsible team.
Explore this workflowIllustrative workflow · subject to agreed scope
Illustrative workflow: an incoming message asks to move a delivery appointment. The shipment is already planned and may need human review.
Match approved references and the sender’s context. Distinguish a delivery change from a second request for a different movement.
Compare dates, location and appointment information. Flag missing time zones or a change that conflicts with the active plan.
Present the proposed change and evidence to the authorized owner. Do not automatically reroute transport or notify unrelated parties.
Apply the approved update through the selected interface and check the resulting state. Keep a failed or ambiguous update open for resolution.
Connection approach
Descartes Transportation Manager for Shippers publicly describes API connectivity and EDI messaging. This establishes possible integration approaches for that product, but the public overview is not a complete endpoint, authentication or object-permission specification.
For your environment, obtain the product-specific interface documentation and access requirements from the administrator or vendor. Confirm whether the proposed process uses an API, an EDI exchange or existing middleware. Record supported message versions, business acknowledgements and retry rules; do not invent a universal Descartes API.
Setup requirements
Confirm which Descartes solution is deployed, the business owner and the initial operational workflow.
Obtain the supported API or message specification, authentication method, test access and any provisioning requirements.
Agree shipment references, partner codes, event meanings, time zones and which system owns each field.
Define how to verify acceptance, handle out-of-order messages and reconcile a write whose response was lost.
Control and rollout
Do not update a shipment from a similar customer name alone. Ambiguous references need human resolution.
An estimated arrival is not proof of delivery. Keep the source, event type and observation time with the proposed update.
Measure correct matches, rejected updates and manual corrections for one team before enabling additional processes.
Common questions
No. Product names, interfaces and enabled modules must be verified. A TMS integration is not automatically a MacroPoint, customs or routing integration.
Not necessarily. The appropriate route may be a documented API or an existing EDI or middleware exchange. It must support the required fields and completion checks.
The reviewed public product material does not establish the endpoint contract for your deployment. That specification should come from the appropriate administrator or vendor.
Yes. Design the first workflow to prepare changes and route exceptions, with submission enabled only where both system permissions and operating policy allow it.
Product names identify the systems discussed. This page does not imply vendor certification, partnership or endorsement. Supported actions and the implementation scope are confirmed with your team.
Start with a defined scope
Map the inputs, system access and approval boundaries with Shipflow. Agree on a useful first integration and how to verify its result.
Book a working session